Okay, the FCC has spoken. It says it has the authority to regulate the Internet. Regulate the Internet? The very idea has some computer geeks laughing into their Ramon noodles.
But Internet regulation by the FCC is no joke. FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell, a Bush appointee, characterized the FCC plan as “an obsessive quest to regulate at all costs.” And many industry watchers have warned that FCC regulation will discourage investment and impose unnecessary regulations on what has remained a robust industry despite our otherwise dismal economic climate.
The FCC regulatory order was issued late in 2010. The Republicans, who uniformly oppose Internet regulation by the Executive Branch, were quick to respond. Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) introduced the Internet Freedom Act (H.R. 96) on January 5, only two days after the 112th Congress convened.
Penegra tablets levitra purchase canada check out over here purchasers must utmost to their proposed serious wellbeing twists. Psychological issues related to male sexual failure may lead to increased heart rate, blood pressure http://www.daveywavey.tv/levitra-5296.html online cialis canada issues and finally fatigue. Men with high blood pressure may also have its influence on stomach and may result in indigestion as a side effect. cialis prescription online Steroids have the ability for causing severe damages to the penile organ, cheapest brand viagra muscles or disease.2) Mental issues: Psychological pressures, stiffness in thinking, depression, stress, etc. A second bill, The Internet Investment, Innovation, and Competition Preservation Act (H.R. 166), was introduced later that same day. This bill, sponsored by Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-FL), prohibits the FCC from regulating the rates, terms, conditions, provisioning, or use of an information service or an Internet access service unless: (1) there is a market failure in the provision of such service; (2) there is substantial evidence such failure is preventing a substantial number of consumers nationwide from accessing a substantial amount of lawful Internet content, applications, and services of their choice on a continuing basis; (3) regulations are necessary to ameliorate such consumer harm; and (4) the FCC has performed a cost-benefit analysis determining that the benefit of such regulation exceeds its costs.
With the House well under Republican control, it seems likely that one of the bills, or perhaps an amalgamation of the two, will make it to the Senate. What happens after that is anyone’s guess.
To read the full text of H.R. 166, go to http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.166:.